A  ·  A ·  A
Denise A. Agnew
Louise Allen
Nina Bangs
L.A. Banks
Terri Brisbin
Jaci Burton
Dianne Castell
Linda Conrad
Sydney Croft
Janelle Denison
Delilah Devlin
HelenKay Dimon
Barbara Dunlop
Susan Grant
Laura Griffin
Julia Harper
Elizabeth Hoyt
Larissa Ione
Myla Jackson
Lydia Joyce
Julia Justiss
Alison Kent
Julie Leto
Sarah McCarty
Patrice Michelle
Liddy Midnight
Shelley Munro
Kathleen O'Reilly
Tessa Radley
Joanne Rock
Melissa Schroeder
Jan Springer
Shannon Stacey
Susan Stephens
Tawny Taylor
LaConnie Taylor-Jones
Stephanie Tyler
Shiloh Walker
Tracy Anne Warren
Lauren Willig
The thin line between love and hate
« Change is in the Air | Home | Is Anne Stuart the Thom Yorke of Romantic Suspense? »

With a melodramatic title like that, readers are probably anticipating a post about the passionate love-hate relationships that some heroines and heroes have. But that’s not the love-hate that I’ve been thinking about lately. Instead, my relationship (hah!) with Harlequin Enterprises is the focus of the love-hate tension. Any entity who has such a huge role in an industry is bound to provoke reactions along the entire spectrum of emotion, right? Good and bad. There will be fans and detractors. And I’m both a fan and a critic.

I bought an ebook directly from Harlequin last week. I’ve bought their ebooks before, but always through Fictionwise, because I usually prefer to use a single distribution source rather than have a dozen accounts established at a dozen different epublisher sites. This time, though, my purchase was from the eHarlequin site because the book I wanted is a November release, and is not yet available elsewhere. Having immediate gratification issues, I couldn’t wait two more weeks and had to have it. Now! Or then, rather. The purchase was a bit of a hassle, frankly. Although I already had a Harlequin account, having purchased print books from the site before, that account was not recognized for the purpose of purchasing an ebook. So I had to establish a second account. The ebook and the print book divisions are likely just that — separate divisions. But to have two separate accounts (separate logons, separate passwords) in order to buy different formats from the same publisher? Irritating.

Which got me thinking about what it is that I like about Harlequin on a larger scale, and what I think could use improvement. On the pro side of the page: the variety of genres and subgenres published, and the company’s history as an outlet for genre romance dating back decades before genre romance was published by anyone else. On the con side: the never-ending stream of virgins, mistresses, secret babies, billionaires, sheikhs, cowboys and special forces heroes. The ridiculous titles and the misleading back blurbs.

Some very big name authors honed their craft while writing for Harlequin — Nora Roberts being the biggest name of all within the genre. Other authors found their niche when they sold to Harlequin, and continue to sell exclusively to a particular line. Though I complain about the predictability of many of the storylines that are offered, I do think the company does a pretty good job of covering all the possible genre romance bases. [Some better than others, to be honest.] Certainly it has shown an ability to grow and change — it missed some big trends and changes in the industry, like the explosion of ebooks and erotic romance, but got up to speed when it saw where the market was going, with varying degrees of success.

I’m less familiar with other publishing houses, primarily because I don’t pay a huge amount of attention. [Hqn is the exception for me, because it is a monolith in the industry.] Are there other publishers (print and e) that are doing good things for romance readers? For readers generally?

Do you read any Hqn lines? Mira? Luna? Silhouette? Red Dress Ink? NeXT? If you do, what is it that you like about those series? Are there things you would change? Things that you both love and hate?


This entry was posted by JMC on Monday, October 20th, 2008 at 6:00 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “The thin line between love and hate”

  1. willaful said:

    I read both old and new Harlequin Presents and I see so much more variety and room for the unexpected in the older ones, particularly those from the early 90s. I know I’ve mentioned it before, but there is actually far more emphasis on virginity (and mistresses) in the current books, which creates the curious situation of more recent books feeling more dated than older ones. Almost all of my HP special keepers are older books and since I’m just reading them now, it’s not nostalgia.


  2. jmc said:

    Hi, willaful.

    I was thinking about the difference between the older lines and their newer ones as I wrote my post. As a teenager in the late 80s and early 90s, I read dozens and dozens of HPs, and I don’t remember them being all about virginity and mistresses and princes and sheikhs. Sure, there were a lot of punishing kisses and alpha businessmen, but the heroines seemed less like doormats.

    I wonder if I looked at fictiondb.com or BYRON, would there be a watershed moment in HP history, when suddenly the titles and the stories changed? Was there a moment or was it a gradual shift? Hmmm.


  3. RfP said:

    Willaful, I agree, it’s not nostalgia: the titles, the cover blurbs, and the stories were more varied and more interesting to me in the ’90s.

    JMC, yes, the watershed moment was about 2000. A few months ago I looked at how titles have changed:

    “These titles are a relatively recent trend. In Harlequin Presents titles from the 1980s and early ’90s few heroines, and few actions, were “owned” by the hero, and titular “virgins” were fairly rare; Brittany’s Castle was as likely a title as Taggart’s Woman.”

    Those links go to the RomanceWiki’s “Harlequin Presents By The Numbers” pages. It’s a great resource, but the evidence is a bit dispiriting. In a way I would rather believe my nostalgia’s leading me astray, but no. There’s an external reason I don’t read Harlequin Presents any more.


  4. kh said:

    i read hqn, deisres, blazess, mira


  5. jmc said:

    RfP, thanks for the links!

    kh, what do you like about those particular lines?


  6. kh said:

    they are good hot an dthe authors i like to read. are cheaper then the olong novels


  7. RfP said:

    I was just about to try a few Harlequin Blazes, but it’s more fun watching DocTurtle’s Blaze liveblogging.


Leave a Comment